The New York Rangers are in need of defensive reinforcements, as they’ve struggled in their own zone throughout the season. Fortunately, they have plenty of cap space to address this issue at the trade deadline. However, this has led to speculation about potential acquisitions, including some less-than-ideal options. Some old-school voices have even suggested the Rangers should reach out to the Chicago Blackhawks about acquiring defenseman Seth Jones, who recently expressed frustration with constant losing. But making that move would be a major mistake.
Jones was once regarded as an elite defenseman during his time with the Columbus Blue Jackets, but those days are long gone. His performance has declined significantly in Chicago, turning his contract into one of the worst in the NHL. At this point in his career, teams should be steering clear of the baggage that comes with him.
Jones is signed for another four years at $9.5 million per season and has already passed the age of 30. In 38 games this season, the Arlington, Texas native has recorded six goals and 20 assists for 28 points. While he can still contribute offensively—particularly as a power-play quarterback—his defensive shortcomings are glaring.
At even strength, Jones’ numbers paint an unflattering picture. He has a goals-for rate of 2.71 per 60 minutes (GF/60) but allows 3.14 goals against per 60 (GA/60). His expected goals-for rate (xGF/60) is even lower at 2.21, while his expected goals-against rate (xGA/60) remains high at 3.11. For context, these figures are worse than those of Ryan Lindgren, who is widely regarded as the weakest defenseman on the Rangers’ roster.
While the Blackhawks’ struggles have contributed to Jones’ poor numbers, his individual play is also a significant factor. He simply isn’t the player he once was, and his burdensome contract makes him an even riskier investment. Although Jones’ frustration with losing has fueled trade speculation, any contending team looking to acquire him should proceed with caution—especially the Rangers. New York would be wise to avoid taking on what could become a financial and on-ice liability.